Ade Febriady

Ade Febriady

On the 2026–27 economics job market

PhD Candidate in Economics · University of Groningen · expected 2027
Economist (Consultant) · The World Bank

01

Profile

Two children grow up in the same Indonesian village and finish the same number of years of school. Decades later, one earns far more from that education, often for no other reason than having grown up poor.

I work on why disadvantage outlasts the conditions that created it. I am a PhD candidate in economics at the University of Groningen (expected 2027), supervised by Prof. dr. Viola Angelini and Dr. Agnieszka Postepska. My research examines how childhood poverty shapes the returns to education in Indonesia, and how climate shocks, such as Mongolia’s extreme winters (dzud), affect poverty and inequality.

I came to research from the policy side: more than five years as a consultant economist with the World Bank, working on poverty assessments, crisis monitoring, and large-scale household surveys, from instrument design and fieldwork through to published microdata. I hold my work to two standards: it has to stand up methodologically, and it has to matter to the people it describes.

Primary fields: Development economics; Poverty & inequality; Labour & education economics; Climate shocks & household welfare.
Secondary fields: Behavioral & experimental economics; Applied microeconometrics.

02

Job Market Paper

Job Market Paper

The Long Shadow: Childhood Poverty and the Returns to Education

with Agnieszka Postepska and Viola Angelini · GLO Discussion Paper No. 1731 (2026)

Abstract

This study documents substantial heterogeneity in returns to education by childhood poverty status among Indonesian wage workers aged 15–35. Individuals who grew up poor earn only 1.5 percent per additional year of schooling, less than one-fourth of the 6.8 percent earned by those who were never poor. We estimate these returns using a control-function approach that exploits conditional heteroskedasticity for identification in the absence of exclusion restrictions. The control-function coefficient is three times larger among the poor, indicating markedly stronger positive selection into schooling in this group: only individuals with exceptionally favorable unobserved characteristics attain higher levels of education. We also present descriptive evidence of lower skill accumulation per year of schooling and more limited access to high-paying jobs among disadvantaged individuals, patterns consistent with lower marginal returns. These findings highlight the limited equalizing role of education, measured here by years of schooling.

03

Research

Working Papers

The Cold Shock: Poverty Impacts of Extreme Winter in Mongolia

with Lydia Kim · Background paper, World Bank 2026 Mongolia Poverty Assessment (in progress)

Abstract

Climate shocks threaten poverty reduction, yet evidence on the poverty effects of cold extremes remains limited. This paper studies Mongolia’s 2023/24 dzud, an extreme winter disaster that killed over eight million livestock in a setting where rural livelihoods remain deeply tied to pastoralism. Using the first nationally representative household panel survey to bracket a major dzud, we exploit spatial variation in winter severity to estimate its effects. Severe exposure prevented a 15.2 percentage-point decline in poverty in the most affected districts, despite a national poverty decline of more than 40 percent over the same period. The effect was concentrated among herders, whose poverty rose sharply while it declined for other groups. The main mechanism was asset destruction, with livestock income accounting for most of the herder income loss. Beyond herders, losses were smaller but concentrated among already-poor households through worsening food insecurity. The findings show that cold extremes can reverse poverty gains by destroying productive assets and weakening food security, even when aggregate poverty is falling.

Three-panel difference-in-differences chart of poverty rates in 2022 and 2024 for treated and control districts, with a counterfactual trend. For all households, treated-area poverty stays flat while control-area poverty falls sharply. For herder households, treated poverty rises from 20 to 32 percent while control falls from 45 to 32 percent. For non-herder households, the difference is small and imprecise.
The result in one picture: poverty in treated districts stalled while control districts tracked the national decline; against the counterfactual trend, the dzud prevented a 15.2 pp drop. The middle panel shows the effect is concentrated among herders, whose poverty rose from 20 to 32 percent.

Work in Progress

Selected Presentations

04

Data & Survey Work

A core part of my work is running large household surveys end-to-end with World Bank teams: designing instruments, managing fieldwork across phone, face-to-face, and hybrid modes, and cleaning, documenting, and publicly disseminating the resulting microdata. Together we have carried this through multiple survey rounds covering thousands of households.

05

Software

06

Teaching

07

Curriculum Vitae

Full CV — research, professional experience, awards, and references. Download CV (PDF)
08

Contact

If you work on poverty, mobility, education, or climate and development, I would be glad to hear what you are working on, and to find where the work overlaps.

Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
a.febriady@rug.nl  ·  febriadyade@gmail.com
LinkedIn  ·  ORCID  ·  GitHub

References